購読する
モデル製品
サービス
前臨床薬効評価
コミュ二ティー
huFUS Mouse
製品のお見積りを依頼する
当社のカタログから製品を選択してご注文ください。当社チームが詳細な情報をご連絡いたします。
huFUS Mouse
製品名
huFUS Mouse
製品ID
C001965
系統名
C57BL/6JCya-Fustm2(hFUS)/Cya
背景情報
C57BL/6JCya
状況
このマウス系統を論文で使用する場合は、「huFUS Mouse(カタログ番号C001965)はサイアジェンから購入しました。」と引用してください。
HUGO-GT Humanized Models
Neurodegenerative Diseases
製品タイプ
年齢
遺伝子型
性別
数量
標準的な配送方法では、少なくとも3匹のヘテロ接合体キャリアを保証しています。ホモ接合体キャリアや指定された性別の個体の繁殖サービスも利用可能です。
お見積もりについてはこちらまでご連絡ください
HUGO-GT Humanized Models
Neurodegenerative Diseases
基本情報
検証 Data
関連リソース
基本情報
遺伝子名
遺伝子別名
TLS, ALS6, ETM4, FUS1, POMP75, altFUS, HNRNPP2
NCBI ID
染色体
Chr 16
MGI ID
さらに
系統詳細
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as motor neuron disease, is a fatal progressive neurodegenerative disease. The disease is caused by the degeneration and death of motor neurons that control skeletal muscles in the central nervous system, leading to gradual muscle weakness and atrophy, and ultimately complete loss of voluntary movement control by the brain [1]. Unlike Alzheimer’s disease, ALS does not necessarily affect higher brain functions. On the contrary, late-stage patients can maintain clear thinking and retain memories, personality, and intelligence before the onset of the disease. The known ALS-causing genes include SOD1, ALS2, TARDBP, and FUS, among others.
FUS is a multifunctional DNA/RNA binding protein typically located in the cell nucleus and can shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm. FUS protein plays an important role in RNA transcription, splicing, and microRNA processing. Mutations in the FUS gene are closely related to frontotemporal lobar degeneration/dementia (FTLD-FUS) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS-FUS). More than 50 FUS gene mutations have been identified in familial and sporadic ALS patients, most of which are autosomal dominant and most of which affect the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of FUS protein [2]. ALS-FUS patients have a histopathological feature of FUS protein mislocalization to the cytoplasm and formation of FUS-positive inclusions in spinal motor neurons and glial cells. However, in current cases, only some patients exhibit FUS mislocalization, and changes in the nuclear function of FUS mutants can also cause ALS. Studies have found that FUS pathological mice can induce neurodegeneration without cytoplasmic pathology or obvious mislocalization, which strongly suggests that the nuclear toxic function of FUS mutants may be a potential pathogenic mechanism [2].
Most FUS-targeting drugs in development are gene therapies, including antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs). The ASO drug ION363 developed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals can effectively reduce abnormal expression of FUS in diseased mice [3]. Humanizing mouse genes, given the genetic differences between animals and humans, can accelerate the development of FUS-targeted gene therapy for clinical use. This strain is a mouse Fus gene humanized model and can be used for research on ALS. The homozygous huFUS mice are viable and fertile. In addition, based on the independently developed TurboKnockout fusion BAC recombination technology, Cyagen can also generate hot mutation models based on this strain (e.g., FUS (p.R521C)) and provide customized services for specific mutations to meet the experimental needs in pharmacology and other fields related to ALS.
参考文献
Motor Neuron Diseases Fact Sheet. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS).
An, H., Skelt, L., Notaro, A. et al. ALS-linked FUS mutations confer loss and gain of function in the nucleus by promoting excessive formation of dysfunctional paraspeckles. acta neuropathol commun 7, 7 (2019).
Korobeynikov VA, Lyashchenko AK, Blanco-Redondo B, Jafar-Nejad P, Shneider NA. Antisense oligonucleotide silencing of FUS expression as a therapeutic approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Med. 2022 Jan;28(1):104-116.
系統作製戦略
The sequences from the ATG start codon to downstream of exon 15 of the endogenous mouse Fus gene were replaced with the sequences from the ATG start codon to downstream of exon 15 of the human FUS gene.

Figure 1. Gene editing strategy of huFUS mice.
適用分野
Research on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS);
Research on frontotemporal lobar degeneration/dementia (FTLD-FUS).
検証 Data
1. Gene Expression
RT‑qPCR results showed that human FUS was highly expressed in the brain and spleen of huFUS mice, with no expression of mouse Fus. In WT mice, only mouse Fus was expressed in the brain and spleen, while human FUS was not detected. (ND: Not detected)

Figure 2. Expression analysis of human FUS and mouse Fus in the brain and spleen of 6‑week‑old female wild‑type (WT) and huFUS mice.
2. Protein Expression
As the antibody cross‑recognizes hFUS (predicted molecular weight ~75.4 kDa) and mFUS (predicted molecular weight ~75.3 kDa), the FUS protein was detected in the cerebral cortex of both homozygous huFUS and WT mice.

Figure 3. Western Blot analysis of FUS protein expression in homozygous huFUS and wild‑type (WT) mice.
3. Results of Behavioral Tests on 8-week-old Mice
(1)Grip strength, force

Figure 4. The force for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in grip strength test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences.
Indications: No significant alterations in force across all models, indicating similar muscle activity.
(2)Rotarod, latency

Figure 5. The latency to fall for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in rotarod test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA for normally distributed data and Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data; "ns" indicates no significant differences.
Indications: No significant alterations in latency across all models, indicating similar motor activity and coordination across all models.
(3)Novel object recognition, object preference (male)

Figure 6. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 8-week-old male mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Indications: WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C displayed a strong tendency to investigate new objects.
(4)Novel object recognition, object preference (female)

Figure 7. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 8-week-old female mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Indications: WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C displayed a strong tendency to investigate new objects.
(5)Novel object recognition, object preference (mixed-sex)

Figure 8. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 8-week-old mixed-sex mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Indications: WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C displayed a strong tendency to investigate new objects.
4. Results of Behavioral Tests on 12-week-old Mice
(1)Grip strength, force

Figure 9. The force for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in grip strength test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences, *p < 0.05.
Indications: Female huFUS-R521C mice exhibited a significant decrease in grip strength compared to WT mice, indicating impaired muscle function.
(2)Rotarod, latency

Figure 10. The latency to fall for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in rotarod test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Indications: huFUS-R521C mice exhibited a significant reduction in latency to fall compared to both WT and huFUS mice, regardless of sex or sex-mixed comparisons, indicating impaired motor activity and coordination.
(3)Open field, travel distance

Figure 11. The distance traveled for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in open field test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences, *p < 0.05.
Indications: Female huFUS mice exhibited a significant increase in travel distance compared to WT controls.
(4)Open field, central area time ratio

Figure 12. The time ratio of the central area for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in open field test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Indications: In sex-mixed comparisons, both huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice exhibited a significantly higher central time ratio than WT controls, which may suggest underlying physiological differences between HUGO mice and WT mice.
(5)Novel object recognition, object preference (male)

Figure 13. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 12-week-old male mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; "ns" indicates no significant differences, **p < 0.01.
Indications: WT and huFUS exhibited a strong preference for exploring the novel object, reflecting intact episodic memory. But huFUS-R521C showed a slight, but statistically non-significant increase in preference for the novel object, indicating a substantial deficit in episodic memory.
(6)Novel object recognition, object preference (female)

Figure 14. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 12-week-old female mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; "ns" indicates no significant differences, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Indications: WT and huFUS exhibited a strong preference for exploring the novel object, reflecting intact episodic memory. But huFUS-R521C showed a slight, but statistically non-significant increase in preference for the novel object, indicating a substantial deficit in episodic memory.
(7)Novel object recognition, object preference (mixed-sex)

Figure 15. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 12-week-old mixed-sex mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.
Indications: WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C displayed a strong tendency to investigate new objects. When analyzed separately, neither male nor female huFUS-R521C mice showed a significant preference for the novel object, although both exhibited a weak trend toward novelty. However, when sexes were pooled, the huFUS-R521C group displayed a significant preference, an effect likely attributable to increased power from combining sexes rather than robust discrimination ability.
5. Results of Behavioral Tests on 16-week-old Mice
(1)Grip strength, force

Figure 16. The force for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in grip strength test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences.
Indications: No significant alterations in force across all models, indicating similar muscle activity.
(2)Rotarod, latency

Figure 17. The latency to fall for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in rotarod test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Indications: huFUS-R521C mice exhibited a significant reduction in latency to fall compared to both WT and huFUS mice, regardless of sex or sex-mixed comparisons, indicating impaired motor activity and coordination.
(3)Open field, travel distance

Figure 18. The distance traveled for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in open field test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences, **p < 0.01.
Indications: Female huFUS mice exhibited a significant increase in travel distance compared to WT controls.
(4)Open field, central area time ratio

Figure 19. The time ratio of the central area for WT, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice in open field test. Data were analyzed using an ordinary one-way ANOVA; "ns" indicates no significant differences, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Indications: In both female and sex-mixed comparisons, huFUS and huFUS-R521C mice showed a significantly higher central time ratio compared to WT controls, which may suggest underlying physiological differences between HUGO mice and WT mice.
(5)Novel object recognition, object preference (male)

Figure 20. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 16-week-old male mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; "ns" indicates no significant differences, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Indications: WT and huFUS exhibited a strong preference for exploring the novel object, reflecting intact episodic memory. In contrast, huFUS-R521C mice exhibited almost no variation in their exploration patterns between familiar and novel objects, implying a considerable deficit in episodic memory.
(6)Novel object recognition, object preference (female)

Figure 21. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 16-week-old female mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; "ns" indicates no significant differences, ***p < 0.001.
Indications: WT and huFUS exhibited a strong preference for exploring the novel object, reflecting intact episodic memory. In contrast, huFUS-R521C mice exhibited almost no variation in their exploration patterns between familiar and novel objects, implying a considerable deficit in episodic memory.
(7)Novel object recognition, object preference (mixed-sex)

Figure 22. The object preference (percentage of exploring the specific object/total exploration time of both objects) of 16-week-old mixed-sex mice over a duration of 10 minutes was measured. Statistical comparisons were performed using a paired t-test; "ns" indicates no significant differences, ***p < 0.001.
Indications: WT and huFUS displayed a strong tendency to investigate new objects. In contrast, huFUS-R521C mice exhibited almost no variation in their exploration patterns between familiar and novel objects, implying a considerable deficit in episodic memory.
6. Growth Curve

Figure 23. Growth curve of wild-type (WT), huFUS, and huFUS-R521C mice.
関連リソース
お問い合わせ
ご不明な点やご質問などございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください。担当スタッフがサポートさせていただきます。下記のフォームにご記入いただければ、1〜2営業日以内に折り返しご連絡いたします。
Related Product
All Related ProductsResources
お問い合わせ
カスタムの動物モデルに関するご相談は、下記のフォームにご記入いただき、ご連絡いただくか見積もりをご依頼ください。
Cyagenはお客様のプライバシーを大変重視しています。当社の最新の製品や情報をお届けしたいと思っています。お客様の設定をご確認ください。
これらの配信はいつでも解除できます。配信停止方法およびデータ保護の詳細は プライバシーポリシー をご確認ください。
以下のボタンをクリックすることで、このフォームにご入力いただいた個人情報をCyagenが保存・処理し、ご要望のコンテンツを提供することに同意されたことになります。
